🐱 Canon Rf 24 105 L Review

และ canon ก็ได้สร้างเลนส์ระยะ 24-105mm ออกมามากมายหลายเวอร์ชั่น. มีทั้งเวอร์ชั่น L และเวอร์ชั่นไม่ L. คุณสมบัติเด่นๆ. น้ำหนักตัวเลนส์ Color is typical for Canon L lenses, with good color saturation that isn’t over the top. There’s a nice balance to the color response that I find quite pleasing. Pool on Massies Creek – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 58mm, f/16, 30s, ISO 100. With regards to chromatic aberration, the RF 24-105mm puts in a solid performance. RF 24-240mm / RF 24-105 f/4 L prints viewing at normal viewing distance. Base upon my use of the RF 24-240mm I agree with the others that appreciate the lens, and Scott Kelby's video about the lens HERE. Bottom line, yes a 24-105 "L" 4X zoom range lens ' SHOULD ' be sharper than a non-"L" lens with a 10X zoom range. As you can see, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM promises to be an attractive companion to the EOS R system. Currently, it sells for a price of $1,100. Interestingly enough, Canon doesn’t offer any discount for buying the lens along with the EOS R camera body. Principal specifications. Lens type. Zoom lens. Max Format size. 35mm FF. Focal length. 24–105 mm. Image stabilization. Yes (5.5EV (8.0 with co-ordinated IS bodies)) Either lens, the RF24-105L or RF-S 18-150, would give excellent image IQ, especially for more casual use. Despite that, I've opted for the 24-240 as the extended reach gives a bit more versatility and suits my preferred shooting style and subject matter. It complements my RF16 f/2.8, EF-S 24 f/2.8, and the RF 100-500L. Canon_Guy wrote: I went from EF 24-105/4 version 1 to RF 24-105/4 together with my transition from 5D mk Iii to R6. Optically, it is an upgrade. When you pixel peek 1;1 on your monitor, RF is a bit sharper in general. The 105mm end wide opened is clearly better. But RF sometimes suffers more from CA's. These are rare occassions. BM1Y.

canon rf 24 105 l review